Imani, Laura, Gloria & Jackie are all full of SHIT! They all find ways to work Draya into their conversations yet Laura just swore up and down to Draya that she doesn't think about her. This is the same bitch that googled Draya's name on the internet and helped spread the word about her abandonment case and arrest record.
When Laura addressed Draya in the park she referred to her as a jump-off, a hooker and whatever other little nasty name she could muster out of her dumb, gutter ass mouth. Draya is doing her best to control her hands and behavior, which I applaud, because frankly Laura and I would've likely had ended up on the ground. I see she didn't learn from that last "Malaysian" pop to watch her damn mouth!
Imani looked pissed when Jackie said that she didn't dislike Draya. She really wants all the women to HATE Draya as much as she does. But what Imani doesn't understand is that most of those women don't carry the same INSECURITIES about age, weight and looks, that SHE does. Imani is the type of bitch that thought she would be young forever. She has obviously found it difficult to age and although she likes to pretend she's so classy and graceful, she definitely is not. And her lack of etiquette & humility shows whenever Draya is around. Did you guys catch that remark she made to Draya in episode 6? Draya said that the guys that would show up in the clubs would choose her because they liked the classy strippers and Imani's response was "that's a contradiction in terms". What a BITCH! LOL.
Imani acts as if she's from royalty or wealth, but she is undeniably classless. All she does is pick on Draya and gossip about Draya & Malaysia when they aren't around...
Jackie Christie is a psychotic, bi-polar acting, really old battle axe. She starts more drama than NBC, but acts as if she's a peace maker. This heifa needs to be slapped too. The proof of her bi-polarism showed at the charity event. She was starting to gossip about Laura to Draya after pretending all this time to be Lauras' friend. Then she starts beefing with Laura at the event. Jackie was second only to Imani in dogging out Draya. Talking about how disrespectful she was to miss her wedding, etc., etc. Now at this charity event she's up in Draya's face gossiping about Laura and what she said. Two faces on one head.
Everyone is watching Draya, but they need to be watching Jackie. She is truly a trouble making, two-faced busy body with a know-it-all attitude. I really don't care for her on this show.
Draya is the draw and if these morons run her off, they can kiss this show goodbye!
This blog is where I discuss my views on social issues and occasionally I will cover topics in the entertainment/celebrity world. You can find my vlog on YOUTUBE at http://www.youtube.com/user/janespeaks
Friday, October 14, 2011
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Basketball Wives L.A. Season 1 Episode 6....In My Opinion
I've been watching this show since the beginning and it's kind of boring, too many old women; Jackie, Tanya, Kimsha, Imani.
The only spice in the show is Draya and they keep fucking with her!! She is THAT show and although I don't like what I am hearing about her abandoning her son and leaving him in deplorable conditions at her home, I still think she should be a part of the show.
I must say I dislike Imani the most though. She is just an old, bitter, overweight, jealous-of-Draya's youth, lonely heifa. She constantly has Drayas' name in her mouth, yet talks about how worthless she is. Worthless means lacking in value, but there must be some value in her if Imani is constantly talking about her.
Jackie bitching about Draya not attending her wedding is bullshit. She didn't really want her there anyway! So, this is really all about wanting beef and she's wayyyy too damn old for that. Jackie comes off as trying to be the peace maker, but she's really a shit starter. She did it with Tanya and now she's doing it with Draya.
I see Gloria is still hanging in there with Matt. She acts as if she's got it all together but this bitch knows if Matt decides to marry they will marry and if he decides to chuck deuces, she's out! PERIOD. She sounds like she finally woke up and is probably stashing benjamins now. Well, it's never to late to wake up.
What is up with Jackie crying over her 18 years old daughter kissing a boy. Obviously, it wasn't serious and had happened some time ago. The fact that she's so delusional makes me wonder what Doug sees in her.
So, now they've dug up Draya's police report and it just makes me wonder why the hell can't they find something better to do with their time than occupy it with Draya related issues.
The four judge panel; Jackie, Laura, Imani & Gloria with one alternate; Malaysia, seems to be on a none stop witch hunt!
Bottom line....if they get rid of Draya, they have formally killed the show!
The only spice in the show is Draya and they keep fucking with her!! She is THAT show and although I don't like what I am hearing about her abandoning her son and leaving him in deplorable conditions at her home, I still think she should be a part of the show.
I must say I dislike Imani the most though. She is just an old, bitter, overweight, jealous-of-Draya's youth, lonely heifa. She constantly has Drayas' name in her mouth, yet talks about how worthless she is. Worthless means lacking in value, but there must be some value in her if Imani is constantly talking about her.
Jackie bitching about Draya not attending her wedding is bullshit. She didn't really want her there anyway! So, this is really all about wanting beef and she's wayyyy too damn old for that. Jackie comes off as trying to be the peace maker, but she's really a shit starter. She did it with Tanya and now she's doing it with Draya.
I see Gloria is still hanging in there with Matt. She acts as if she's got it all together but this bitch knows if Matt decides to marry they will marry and if he decides to chuck deuces, she's out! PERIOD. She sounds like she finally woke up and is probably stashing benjamins now. Well, it's never to late to wake up.
What is up with Jackie crying over her 18 years old daughter kissing a boy. Obviously, it wasn't serious and had happened some time ago. The fact that she's so delusional makes me wonder what Doug sees in her.
So, now they've dug up Draya's police report and it just makes me wonder why the hell can't they find something better to do with their time than occupy it with Draya related issues.
The four judge panel; Jackie, Laura, Imani & Gloria with one alternate; Malaysia, seems to be on a none stop witch hunt!
Bottom line....if they get rid of Draya, they have formally killed the show!
Friday, July 29, 2011
Why Niggas Always End Up Broke!
I just read that Souljah Boy just bought a G5 jet for $35 million dollars with a $20 million dollar "upgrade" in luxuries including four bars, italian leather seats and custom paint with his logo on the jet. Ha! what a joke in less than 10 years this nigga will be BROKE! Just like MC Hammer.
I don't understand the mentality of some of these guys who come from nothing in terms of wealth and once they make it, they blow through it faster than a hurricane in Mississippi. It's really quite sad because I love to see my brothas and sistas get money but I would just like for them to keep it and pass it down to their children and their childrens-children. In other words LEAVE A FINANCIAL LEGACY.
But most niggas don't think like that. And I use the term niggas because I know that most Black people do think about their legacy, what they would like to pass down generationally, etc. This "new breed" of negroes have got it fucked up. They only think of themselves. Not only that but I guarantee you it never crossed his mind to negotiate the cost of any of that; the jet, the customizing, nothing. And why would he need four bars on a plane that seats only 16 people max?!
It's just like Birdman losing two million dollars on a bet. Our ancestors are probably flipping in their graves right now. That same two million could've fed thousands of Black people that are starving in this country every day. These men don't think- they just act and many times their actions are simply selfish.
Even the Kennedys, who did not come from wealth, had enough wherewithall to understand that once they made their fortune they had to maintain it, spend it wisely and save enough for the next generation to use. That is what a great number of these types of Blacks lack; wisdom.
Anyone with a great credit rating or a ton of money can buy whatever they want, but a wise man knows how, when and what to spend it on....
I don't understand the mentality of some of these guys who come from nothing in terms of wealth and once they make it, they blow through it faster than a hurricane in Mississippi. It's really quite sad because I love to see my brothas and sistas get money but I would just like for them to keep it and pass it down to their children and their childrens-children. In other words LEAVE A FINANCIAL LEGACY.
But most niggas don't think like that. And I use the term niggas because I know that most Black people do think about their legacy, what they would like to pass down generationally, etc. This "new breed" of negroes have got it fucked up. They only think of themselves. Not only that but I guarantee you it never crossed his mind to negotiate the cost of any of that; the jet, the customizing, nothing. And why would he need four bars on a plane that seats only 16 people max?!
It's just like Birdman losing two million dollars on a bet. Our ancestors are probably flipping in their graves right now. That same two million could've fed thousands of Black people that are starving in this country every day. These men don't think- they just act and many times their actions are simply selfish.
Even the Kennedys, who did not come from wealth, had enough wherewithall to understand that once they made their fortune they had to maintain it, spend it wisely and save enough for the next generation to use. That is what a great number of these types of Blacks lack; wisdom.
Anyone with a great credit rating or a ton of money can buy whatever they want, but a wise man knows how, when and what to spend it on....
The Black Woman...
The degradation, destruction and demeaning of Black women have mostly been by the hands, mouths and actions of Black men. This extends from the males who became "fathers" because they insiminated seeds of life into women they had no more use for than a dog has use for a stray. This is also addressed to males that use the bodies of Black women for money making purposes, something to pass the time with or simply some one to keep you entertained until the next bitch comes along.
And I use the word bitch because IF a Black man truly thought of a Black woman AS a WOMAN, he would not treat her as anything less than that.
All too often Black women are blamed for the anger, repression, emasculation and irresponsible behaviors of Black men today. But let's address those issues one by one.
1) The Black mans' anger. You are truly angry at yourselves NOT us. Because if it were not for us many of you would have been parentless. Obviously some of your fathers were not around to help raise you and so it was left up to a BLACK WOMAN to do the best she could in trying to provide for you with a home, food, education and clothing. Sure, there was less family time spent because the Black woman had to get out and earn a living, but your anger is misdirected. You don't punish or speak against the ones that have saved you from poverty and homelessness, while embracing the one who abandoned you (like your father) or worst still embracing those that had NOTHING to do with your survival (like white women).
All too frequently I hear brothas speaking highly of white women and how they BELIEVE they raise their children, handle their men and function within their families. And I think to myself are these niggas blind, deaf and dumb?? It is usually a white womans' child that will walk into a school or public place and shoot the it up. White men cheat on their women/wives too, did everyone forget the infamous Steve Garvey fiasco? Or what about John Edwards cheating on his loyal, DYING wife? So, if the white woman reared her family so much better than Black women does, WHY are they having just as many issues with their children and husbands as we are?
2) Repression. It is not the fault of the Black woman that you can not find a job or manage to keep the one you finally got-only six months ago, if that. It is up to you to find a way to earn a living just like your mother taught you through her example of getting up every morning and taking the bus if she had to, just to get to work and provide for you. I truly do not understand any Black male that blames the Black woman for his woes. Many of these women are left with no other choice than to make sacrifices at your expense for the greater good. And she suffers as well. Most mothers want to spend time with their children but when it becomes a matter of live or die - what would you have her choose?
3) Emasculation. Women in general recognize the wrecklessness and havoc that men can create with their barbaric attitudes, so we as Black women use an iron fist sometimes when dealing with Black males because we understand, that should we go "easy" on you, you will take that kindness for naivety or weakness. Our intent is not to emasculate you but to preserve normalcy in our households and beyond (on the street, in the workplace, etc). Ruling with an iron fist can usually keep a person in line and OUT OF PRISON!
4) Irresponsible behaviors is almost synonymous with Black men. There are certain things that you do in society and/or within your own family that you KNOW should not be done like; committing crimes, impregnating women you are not married to, focusing on how you're going to cop the next BS sneaker instead of focusing on how to pay your goddamned child support and on and on and on. Many of you guys are irresponsible DESPITE the fact that you were taught better, yet you still find a way to blame the Black woman. It's absurd!
The Black woman doesn't force you to deal, smuggle or use drugs and/or alcohol. The Black woman usually encourages you to stop those bad behaviors and find a business to invest in instead of investing in ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES aka street commerce. There are Black women that have tolerated infidelities, out of wed-lock/relationship children, etc. Yet she still would stand by you because she saw in you what YOU DID NOT SEE IN YOURSELF; value.
A Black woman will be the backbone of your family not the one that destroys it. She will encourage you, uplift you, stand beside you and always support you in your endeavors. She picks up the slack where you have broken down and she dries your tears when no one else even knew you were in sorrow.
Yet some of you still prey on us and try to tear us down either by your insensitive & atrocious behavior or by your offensive and degrading words.
So, I say to hell with the degradation of Black women and the hate speech that a lot of Black men are spewing in our society today. There are no perfect people and yes, some of us are beyond flawed, but generally speaking the Black woman is the best thing the universe could've given to the world and especially given the Black man.
janespeaks
And I use the word bitch because IF a Black man truly thought of a Black woman AS a WOMAN, he would not treat her as anything less than that.
All too often Black women are blamed for the anger, repression, emasculation and irresponsible behaviors of Black men today. But let's address those issues one by one.
1) The Black mans' anger. You are truly angry at yourselves NOT us. Because if it were not for us many of you would have been parentless. Obviously some of your fathers were not around to help raise you and so it was left up to a BLACK WOMAN to do the best she could in trying to provide for you with a home, food, education and clothing. Sure, there was less family time spent because the Black woman had to get out and earn a living, but your anger is misdirected. You don't punish or speak against the ones that have saved you from poverty and homelessness, while embracing the one who abandoned you (like your father) or worst still embracing those that had NOTHING to do with your survival (like white women).
All too frequently I hear brothas speaking highly of white women and how they BELIEVE they raise their children, handle their men and function within their families. And I think to myself are these niggas blind, deaf and dumb?? It is usually a white womans' child that will walk into a school or public place and shoot the it up. White men cheat on their women/wives too, did everyone forget the infamous Steve Garvey fiasco? Or what about John Edwards cheating on his loyal, DYING wife? So, if the white woman reared her family so much better than Black women does, WHY are they having just as many issues with their children and husbands as we are?
2) Repression. It is not the fault of the Black woman that you can not find a job or manage to keep the one you finally got-only six months ago, if that. It is up to you to find a way to earn a living just like your mother taught you through her example of getting up every morning and taking the bus if she had to, just to get to work and provide for you. I truly do not understand any Black male that blames the Black woman for his woes. Many of these women are left with no other choice than to make sacrifices at your expense for the greater good. And she suffers as well. Most mothers want to spend time with their children but when it becomes a matter of live or die - what would you have her choose?
3) Emasculation. Women in general recognize the wrecklessness and havoc that men can create with their barbaric attitudes, so we as Black women use an iron fist sometimes when dealing with Black males because we understand, that should we go "easy" on you, you will take that kindness for naivety or weakness. Our intent is not to emasculate you but to preserve normalcy in our households and beyond (on the street, in the workplace, etc). Ruling with an iron fist can usually keep a person in line and OUT OF PRISON!
4) Irresponsible behaviors is almost synonymous with Black men. There are certain things that you do in society and/or within your own family that you KNOW should not be done like; committing crimes, impregnating women you are not married to, focusing on how you're going to cop the next BS sneaker instead of focusing on how to pay your goddamned child support and on and on and on. Many of you guys are irresponsible DESPITE the fact that you were taught better, yet you still find a way to blame the Black woman. It's absurd!
The Black woman doesn't force you to deal, smuggle or use drugs and/or alcohol. The Black woman usually encourages you to stop those bad behaviors and find a business to invest in instead of investing in ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES aka street commerce. There are Black women that have tolerated infidelities, out of wed-lock/relationship children, etc. Yet she still would stand by you because she saw in you what YOU DID NOT SEE IN YOURSELF; value.
A Black woman will be the backbone of your family not the one that destroys it. She will encourage you, uplift you, stand beside you and always support you in your endeavors. She picks up the slack where you have broken down and she dries your tears when no one else even knew you were in sorrow.
Yet some of you still prey on us and try to tear us down either by your insensitive & atrocious behavior or by your offensive and degrading words.
So, I say to hell with the degradation of Black women and the hate speech that a lot of Black men are spewing in our society today. There are no perfect people and yes, some of us are beyond flawed, but generally speaking the Black woman is the best thing the universe could've given to the world and especially given the Black man.
janespeaks
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Oklahoma Pharmacist Sentenced For Killing Would-Be Robber
A white Oklahoma City pharmacist has been sentenced to life in prison for the shooting death of would-be Black robber Antwun Parker. I refer to their race for one reason and one reason alone, the media has played this up to the fullest.
In this case I don't know how much race played in this instance. If I, as a business owner, was looking down the barrel of a gun I would shot the culprits too. But I'm a bit torn on this story because the pharmacist shot the unarmed 16 year old would-be robber once initially and then went back to pump five more shots in him as he laid unconscious on the ground and UNARMED...
I am all for people protecting themselves, their property, their loved ones and whomever else they need to protect when faced with imminent danger. But this was not the case. After the first shot put down the 16 year old, the 14 year old armed co-culprit (Jevontia Ingram) ran out the front door of the business.
Jerome Ersland, 59, justified his additional shots by stating that the would-be robber still posed a threat to him and his two co-workers. Thousands of people have signed petitions asking Governor Mary Fallin to pardon Ersland or at least ease his sentence....
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Because here's my problem. He shot the kid in the head the first time and the kid fell unconscious to the ground, unarmed. The 14 year old kid who was not shot was actually the one with the gun and he also was the one that got away. So, there was no threat of harm to Ersland because the guy with the gun ran off & the other one was on the ground, unconscious, but still alive. He was not justified in killling him. He would've only been justified in shooting that kid and killing him had all five or six shots been consecutive. At least then he could've said well, I shot at him because he posed a threat and his partner had a gun so I was shooting at them both or something to that effect. But, when he had an opportunity to call the police and an ambulance he instead opted to go behind the counter, grab a different gun, come back, stand over the kid lying on the floor and pumped five more shots into him for good measure. I have a problem with calling that self-defense.
That is not self-defense. You are not defending against anything! You are enraged and shooting in cold blood. If this were a wetback I would not have a problem with this. But I have a problem with THIS- because the kid was Black, young, possibly made a mistake, possibly went along with his friend to see if they could pull the caper off and ended up getting his life taken away by an overzealous pharmacist that very possibly had pre-existing animosity toward Blacks....
But guess what else I have a problem with? The mother of the dead would-be robber now wants to sue the pharmacist!
1) This man is going to jail for life. How is he going to pay her? 2) How much responsibility lies with her 16 yr.old son who knew what he was doing was wrong? 3) How much of this lies at her feet? Afterall, where was she when he was running the street? Why didn't she have a tighter grip on him?
According to the probable cause report, Ingram (the 14 yr. old) said he was contacted by a friend of his mother's and a cousin of that man, both later identified as Emanuel Mitchell and Anthony Morrison. If your child is hanging around people like this YOU are responsible for keeping an overly watchful eye on your child and if need be stop that child from hanging out with those types of people PERIOD.
I'm so sick of people trying to find someone else to blame for their shortcomings. She failed as a parent, she failed as a protector and she will fail in this civil suit as well. She's a three time loser. Her son greatly contributed to his own demise and the fact that this pharmacist was obviously out to kill does not take away from the fact that her son was shot in the commission of a criminal act!
Like I said, I am torn because there was wrong from all parties. I believe the pharmacist should've been armed and used his gun when faced with the armed would-be robbers, but I do not believe he should've went and shot the kid AFTER the kid was down, not to mention UNARMED. The kid was wrong for trying to rob these people and surely contributed to his own death just by being there under those circumstances. And the mother of this kid has a cross to bear as well because of the company she allowed her son to keep.
It's a fucked up situation all around, because now you have a man in prison for life who was, at least at first, just trying to protect his store and co-workers. You have yet another Black male gone and will never see graduation, prom or his first child. And you have a mother who will never watch her son grow into manhood, go off to college or have a family of his own....
No one wins. It's all bad. It's all bad ya'll.
In this case I don't know how much race played in this instance. If I, as a business owner, was looking down the barrel of a gun I would shot the culprits too. But I'm a bit torn on this story because the pharmacist shot the unarmed 16 year old would-be robber once initially and then went back to pump five more shots in him as he laid unconscious on the ground and UNARMED...
I am all for people protecting themselves, their property, their loved ones and whomever else they need to protect when faced with imminent danger. But this was not the case. After the first shot put down the 16 year old, the 14 year old armed co-culprit (Jevontia Ingram) ran out the front door of the business.
Jerome Ersland, 59, justified his additional shots by stating that the would-be robber still posed a threat to him and his two co-workers. Thousands of people have signed petitions asking Governor Mary Fallin to pardon Ersland or at least ease his sentence....
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Because here's my problem. He shot the kid in the head the first time and the kid fell unconscious to the ground, unarmed. The 14 year old kid who was not shot was actually the one with the gun and he also was the one that got away. So, there was no threat of harm to Ersland because the guy with the gun ran off & the other one was on the ground, unconscious, but still alive. He was not justified in killling him. He would've only been justified in shooting that kid and killing him had all five or six shots been consecutive. At least then he could've said well, I shot at him because he posed a threat and his partner had a gun so I was shooting at them both or something to that effect. But, when he had an opportunity to call the police and an ambulance he instead opted to go behind the counter, grab a different gun, come back, stand over the kid lying on the floor and pumped five more shots into him for good measure. I have a problem with calling that self-defense.
That is not self-defense. You are not defending against anything! You are enraged and shooting in cold blood. If this were a wetback I would not have a problem with this. But I have a problem with THIS- because the kid was Black, young, possibly made a mistake, possibly went along with his friend to see if they could pull the caper off and ended up getting his life taken away by an overzealous pharmacist that very possibly had pre-existing animosity toward Blacks....
But guess what else I have a problem with? The mother of the dead would-be robber now wants to sue the pharmacist!
1) This man is going to jail for life. How is he going to pay her? 2) How much responsibility lies with her 16 yr.old son who knew what he was doing was wrong? 3) How much of this lies at her feet? Afterall, where was she when he was running the street? Why didn't she have a tighter grip on him?
According to the probable cause report, Ingram (the 14 yr. old) said he was contacted by a friend of his mother's and a cousin of that man, both later identified as Emanuel Mitchell and Anthony Morrison. If your child is hanging around people like this YOU are responsible for keeping an overly watchful eye on your child and if need be stop that child from hanging out with those types of people PERIOD.
I'm so sick of people trying to find someone else to blame for their shortcomings. She failed as a parent, she failed as a protector and she will fail in this civil suit as well. She's a three time loser. Her son greatly contributed to his own demise and the fact that this pharmacist was obviously out to kill does not take away from the fact that her son was shot in the commission of a criminal act!
Like I said, I am torn because there was wrong from all parties. I believe the pharmacist should've been armed and used his gun when faced with the armed would-be robbers, but I do not believe he should've went and shot the kid AFTER the kid was down, not to mention UNARMED. The kid was wrong for trying to rob these people and surely contributed to his own death just by being there under those circumstances. And the mother of this kid has a cross to bear as well because of the company she allowed her son to keep.
It's a fucked up situation all around, because now you have a man in prison for life who was, at least at first, just trying to protect his store and co-workers. You have yet another Black male gone and will never see graduation, prom or his first child. And you have a mother who will never watch her son grow into manhood, go off to college or have a family of his own....
No one wins. It's all bad. It's all bad ya'll.
Friday, July 8, 2011
Executed Illegal Alien Shouts Viva Mexico! Before Dying...
It's too bad they didn't send this disloyal, anti-North American, piece of rapist gutter shit back to the country he pledges his loyalty to years ago....in a body bag.
Humberto Leal Garcia was an illegal alien, whose family brought him here from mexico when he was two (2) years old. When he was around twenty-one (21) years old, he raped and murdered a sixteen (16) year old girl in Texas. He confessed to the crimes but his lawyers have argued that he was never given the opportunity to seek legal assistance from the mexican government under the international treaty.
The Obama administration tried to stop the execution by appealing to the Supreme Court and asking that they halt the execution until Congress could consider a bill that would bring the U.S. into compliance with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations regarding arrests of foreign nationals (that would've taken at least 6 months). This bill of course was introduced by U.S. Senate Vermont DEMOCRAT Patrick Leahy.
This illegal rapist/murderer confessed to his crimes, was given appropriate legal representation and a fair trial and they still were trying to find ways to keep this scumbag alive.
But please tell me why is it that when they are here illegally, we can not get rid of them? Law enforcement are not even allowed to ask them if they are here illegally. Isn't that ironic? Afterall, the mere word illegal implies they have broken a law.
But we can't get rid of them or refer to them as illegal aliens, when they are here-undocumented and living off the social services, freedoms and fruits of North America. However, we can refer to them as illegal aliens (foreign nationals) for purposes of arguing that they have been "denied" access to proper legal assistance. What a convoluted sham!
But the Supreme Court finally did something right and did not issue a stay of execution for this illegal alien and neither did the Governor of Texas, Rick Perry. Viva TEXAS!!
The Obama administration is a disgrace. He has done everything in his power to show these illegal aliens that he's their friend, even at the expense of the North Americans' trust in his judgement and actions. Most people, especially most Black people, see President Obama as a man first, they do not see him as a grimy, say-what-you-have-to-say-to-get-the-votes-you-need politician. But I do and I always have. The only reason I voted him into office initially was because I felt he was the lesser of two evils. However, now I will vote for a different candidate next election. Another four (4) years of the Obama administration and the national breakfast will be chorizo with beans and rice!
The illegal alien shouting "viva mexico" is a true testament to the common sentiment of most of these illegals that have come here after escaping the horrors and poverty that plagues mexico and south america. They have managed to pop out anchor babies a.k.a. illegal aliens in hospitals that give them full medical care, find housing at discount rates -compliments of Section 8 and other housing programs initially created to accomodate LEGAL North American citizens, get hired for jobs that really should be reserved for North Americans and are living fairly decent, carefree lives. Yet they pledge undying allegiance to mexico.
Any illegal that pledges loyalty to anywhere other than North America should be sent back to that country. PERIOD. These people are terrorists with loyalties to outsiders. Mexico is not our ally.
And truthfully, I wish they would high tail their asses back to the land they love so much and let us get back to living without the early morning sounds of roosters, goats and 10 kids crying all at once. I would love to be able to drive and not almost get into an accident because one of them barely missed hitting my car and I would love for my fellow citizens to get back into the work force-send all of them back to where they came from and I guarantee you the unemployment rate will be cut by three quarters (3/4).
Most people don't want them here anyway. They are undesirable as neighbors, mediocre as employees and they cost this country billions in numerous sectors; housing, welfare, social services, to name a few.
The people in Senate seats and the House of Representatives (which is a sham. who are they truly representing) aren't neighbors with these people. The only occasions when they are in the company of mexicans is when they are being served food, having their cars waxed or their lawns mowed. And after a couple of hours they send them back to the ghettos. So they don't see what we see, living amongst them daily. Because I will guarantee you if Hilary Clinton or Dianne Feinstein walked out of their front doors and into the cesspit that is now greater Los Angeles they would demand those illegals be send back so fast it would make your sombrero spin. They would want a clean city to walk their dogs in, brunch with their friends in and show off to their parents and so DO OTHERS.
Find my vlog on YouTube. Thanks for reading...
Humberto Leal Garcia was an illegal alien, whose family brought him here from mexico when he was two (2) years old. When he was around twenty-one (21) years old, he raped and murdered a sixteen (16) year old girl in Texas. He confessed to the crimes but his lawyers have argued that he was never given the opportunity to seek legal assistance from the mexican government under the international treaty.
The Obama administration tried to stop the execution by appealing to the Supreme Court and asking that they halt the execution until Congress could consider a bill that would bring the U.S. into compliance with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations regarding arrests of foreign nationals (that would've taken at least 6 months). This bill of course was introduced by U.S. Senate Vermont DEMOCRAT Patrick Leahy.
This illegal rapist/murderer confessed to his crimes, was given appropriate legal representation and a fair trial and they still were trying to find ways to keep this scumbag alive.
But please tell me why is it that when they are here illegally, we can not get rid of them? Law enforcement are not even allowed to ask them if they are here illegally. Isn't that ironic? Afterall, the mere word illegal implies they have broken a law.
But we can't get rid of them or refer to them as illegal aliens, when they are here-undocumented and living off the social services, freedoms and fruits of North America. However, we can refer to them as illegal aliens (foreign nationals) for purposes of arguing that they have been "denied" access to proper legal assistance. What a convoluted sham!
But the Supreme Court finally did something right and did not issue a stay of execution for this illegal alien and neither did the Governor of Texas, Rick Perry. Viva TEXAS!!
The Obama administration is a disgrace. He has done everything in his power to show these illegal aliens that he's their friend, even at the expense of the North Americans' trust in his judgement and actions. Most people, especially most Black people, see President Obama as a man first, they do not see him as a grimy, say-what-you-have-to-say-to-get-the-votes-you-need politician. But I do and I always have. The only reason I voted him into office initially was because I felt he was the lesser of two evils. However, now I will vote for a different candidate next election. Another four (4) years of the Obama administration and the national breakfast will be chorizo with beans and rice!
The illegal alien shouting "viva mexico" is a true testament to the common sentiment of most of these illegals that have come here after escaping the horrors and poverty that plagues mexico and south america. They have managed to pop out anchor babies a.k.a. illegal aliens in hospitals that give them full medical care, find housing at discount rates -compliments of Section 8 and other housing programs initially created to accomodate LEGAL North American citizens, get hired for jobs that really should be reserved for North Americans and are living fairly decent, carefree lives. Yet they pledge undying allegiance to mexico.
Any illegal that pledges loyalty to anywhere other than North America should be sent back to that country. PERIOD. These people are terrorists with loyalties to outsiders. Mexico is not our ally.
And truthfully, I wish they would high tail their asses back to the land they love so much and let us get back to living without the early morning sounds of roosters, goats and 10 kids crying all at once. I would love to be able to drive and not almost get into an accident because one of them barely missed hitting my car and I would love for my fellow citizens to get back into the work force-send all of them back to where they came from and I guarantee you the unemployment rate will be cut by three quarters (3/4).
Most people don't want them here anyway. They are undesirable as neighbors, mediocre as employees and they cost this country billions in numerous sectors; housing, welfare, social services, to name a few.
The people in Senate seats and the House of Representatives (which is a sham. who are they truly representing) aren't neighbors with these people. The only occasions when they are in the company of mexicans is when they are being served food, having their cars waxed or their lawns mowed. And after a couple of hours they send them back to the ghettos. So they don't see what we see, living amongst them daily. Because I will guarantee you if Hilary Clinton or Dianne Feinstein walked out of their front doors and into the cesspit that is now greater Los Angeles they would demand those illegals be send back so fast it would make your sombrero spin. They would want a clean city to walk their dogs in, brunch with their friends in and show off to their parents and so DO OTHERS.
Find my vlog on YouTube. Thanks for reading...
Black Mother Turns Kids In For Stealing! Bravo Momi!
So many times in our community people turn "blind eyes" to criminal behavior. There is even a phrase some people in the 'hood -"stop snitching". This phrase is based on street "ethics". There is a rapper named Camron who, when interviewed by Anderson Cooper in 2007, said that no matter what he would never tell on another person, even if it were a serial killer.
I do not subscribe to that street garbage. It's a twisted, gutter way of thinking and most people that say those kinds of things aren't telling the truth anyway. If they ever found themselves in situations where only the police could protect them they would be singing everything they know, like Ella used to sing jazz! High pitch and all!
But that is not the case with this Black mother of two; a boy and a girl, living in Milwaukee. She saw a video on the news of her children, amongst others, looting a store and contacted the police immediately upon confirmation it was indeed them. That took a lot of heart. Because you never want your children to be in trouble with the law and you never want to be the one to send them to jail. But children that do things like that must be taught lessons about criminal behavior, punishments given for those behaviors and hopefully insight into what they do not want to become as adults.
More parents-no matter the ethnicity, should show their criminal behaving children that it is not to their benefit to behave that way. My mother was not as good as this lady. My mother was from the street and she would encourage bad behavior. She was only 14 when she became pregnant with me but even at that age, you still know right from wrong! One time a sister of mine, known for stealing, took some candy from the store. My mother found out about it and laughed, my grandmother made her take the rest back. Thank goodness my grandmother raised us and we learned from her a sense of lawfulness, responsibility and principles.
I'm not saying I'm a saint, lord knows I've done my dirt, but I was a young adult when I decided to ignore my upbringing. I've since grown up. And I would never teach a child of mine to be a criminal. That's not what parents are for. They are educators, protectors and providers.
So, I salute this Black mother for being everything a parent should be to their children. Bravo lady, hopefully they have learned a good lesson.
I do not subscribe to that street garbage. It's a twisted, gutter way of thinking and most people that say those kinds of things aren't telling the truth anyway. If they ever found themselves in situations where only the police could protect them they would be singing everything they know, like Ella used to sing jazz! High pitch and all!
But that is not the case with this Black mother of two; a boy and a girl, living in Milwaukee. She saw a video on the news of her children, amongst others, looting a store and contacted the police immediately upon confirmation it was indeed them. That took a lot of heart. Because you never want your children to be in trouble with the law and you never want to be the one to send them to jail. But children that do things like that must be taught lessons about criminal behavior, punishments given for those behaviors and hopefully insight into what they do not want to become as adults.
More parents-no matter the ethnicity, should show their criminal behaving children that it is not to their benefit to behave that way. My mother was not as good as this lady. My mother was from the street and she would encourage bad behavior. She was only 14 when she became pregnant with me but even at that age, you still know right from wrong! One time a sister of mine, known for stealing, took some candy from the store. My mother found out about it and laughed, my grandmother made her take the rest back. Thank goodness my grandmother raised us and we learned from her a sense of lawfulness, responsibility and principles.
I'm not saying I'm a saint, lord knows I've done my dirt, but I was a young adult when I decided to ignore my upbringing. I've since grown up. And I would never teach a child of mine to be a criminal. That's not what parents are for. They are educators, protectors and providers.
So, I salute this Black mother for being everything a parent should be to their children. Bravo lady, hopefully they have learned a good lesson.
Self Hating Black Women Wear Weaves??
Every morning I get up, turn on my computer and the first page I see is YouTube. I usually check to see how many views I've gotten on particular subjects, what everyone else is watching, etc. etc. Well, one of my subscribers liked a video that appeared interesting so I clicked on it. And of course, it was yet another Black man bashing the Black woman and talking about how those of us that wear weaves are self hating women!!
Black women spend around two hundred twenty five million dollars ($225,000,000) on hair care products annually. Meanwhile, White women spend BILLIONS annually (around $10,500,000,000) on plastic surgery. Over 9.2 million cosmetic surgeries are performed every year-that's just on white women alone. Black women are around 1,047,000 and usually they get breast reductions, liposuction and nose jobs (see American Association of Plastic Surgeons).
I guess the white women hate themselves 10x more than we do. I don't think it's a matter of self-hate at all. I believe most women (those numbers were based on women only) want to be as beautiful as they possibly can and if that means adding hair, darkening your skin or putting some junk-in-your-trunk, men should just be grateful to look at it! And if they are lucky see it on a daily basis. But to degrade women for improving on what nature gave them is ridiculous!
So, while some of these "brothas" are pointing fingers at us and condemning us for beautifying ourselves, I sit back and shake my damn head. Because it's usually the Black man that is first in line to tear down the Black woman, if not another Black woman. And I, for one, am sick of it. Why can't we just be embraced for who we are? Why must we conform to images that may not be condusive to who we are inside? And why can't we wear our hair how we damn well please?
It doesn't make me any less Black because my hair is straight or I decided to add extensions to my mane. I am no less down for Black unity and empowerment because I can now feel my hair silky straight instead of wooly or tightly curled. This mentality will only continue to poison our race and keep us divided as a people.
I always say when a "straight" man talks about how much he hates gay men he must have some secrets/issues he's dealing with internally and the same applies here...
Self hate is a MF, especially when it is masked by people who point fingers at others when they are really addressing the "hate" issues that lurk within themselves.
I'm janespeaks. Find my vlog on YouTube...
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Home Invasion Nets Robbers $40K In Santa Ana
An oriental family; husband, wife and son, were tied up and robbed for $40,000 in cash and valuables. The robbers-six masked, dark clothed individuals, brought pepper spray, guns, duct tape and zip ties to subdue them. Once they had ramsacked the home they fled before police arrived, however, one of them showed her face prior to running and she was described as a young, dark haired mexican who only spoke spanish to her fellow robbers.
Analyzing the Crime Scene:
This was an inside job. Someone that works for them or someone that knows the son set this up. The female robber was described by the husband as looking to be in her teens (16), around the same age as their son. If I were the investigator on this case I would investigate all avenues.
Only someone on the inside would know they had that amount of money in their home. The neighborhood they live in is not an exclusive one of gated community and armed security guards, no, much to the contrary. So, it is common sense to surmise that this robbery was orchestrated by someone that knows how much was in the home and the fact that it would be there at all.
Another angle could be mexican mafia related. The mexican mafia is recruiting younger people now, especially girls and this could very well be somehow related to them. I would not rule it out.
Third angle, this could be a ploy to extort insurance money from their carrier. Afterall, we all know how bad the economy is and we also know how people like to exaggerate how much their losses actually are (example: lose $20K but bump it up to $40K), happens all the time.
I'll be curious to know how this story plays out because I want to know which theory I've described that best fits the story.
Analyzing the Crime Scene:
This was an inside job. Someone that works for them or someone that knows the son set this up. The female robber was described by the husband as looking to be in her teens (16), around the same age as their son. If I were the investigator on this case I would investigate all avenues.
Only someone on the inside would know they had that amount of money in their home. The neighborhood they live in is not an exclusive one of gated community and armed security guards, no, much to the contrary. So, it is common sense to surmise that this robbery was orchestrated by someone that knows how much was in the home and the fact that it would be there at all.
Another angle could be mexican mafia related. The mexican mafia is recruiting younger people now, especially girls and this could very well be somehow related to them. I would not rule it out.
Third angle, this could be a ploy to extort insurance money from their carrier. Afterall, we all know how bad the economy is and we also know how people like to exaggerate how much their losses actually are (example: lose $20K but bump it up to $40K), happens all the time.
I'll be curious to know how this story plays out because I want to know which theory I've described that best fits the story.
Monday, June 13, 2011
Arguments for the Death Penalty & Incarceration for Corrupt Officials
It's not time to stop the executions, it's time to stop the corruption and end the careers of corrupt officials that practice unlawful behaviors such as concealing evidence, coercing witnesses, jury tampering, buying judges, etc...
When you have detectives that are lazy, eager to close cases and over zealous in the pursuit of a conviction, you end up with an unprofessional investigation, sloppy collection of evidence, unthorough questioning of witnesses & suspects and just an overall disorganized body of police work.
What adds insult to injury are judges that are more focused on re-elections than bringing the truth to the surface or doing their best to ensure justice is served, no matter the cost of the pursuit. When that is ignored or not placed into practice you have a tarnished justice system that will inevitably convict an innocent man.
In cases where prosecutors were so hard up to win a case at any expense, innocent people spent many years in prison or had been wrongly put to death. This is all directly related to poor investigations, uneducated or prejudicial jurors, dirty prosecutors, judges that are more concerned with clearing their calendars than the facts of the case and/or the use of jailhouse snitches anxious to spew lies in exchange for freedom or reduced sentences.
Case in point: Reggie DeShawn Cole, incarcerated for 14 years, on a murder & attempted robbery conviction, that he never committed. He maintained his innocence throughout his trial & incarceration. It was only because of his attorney Christopher Plourd, that exculpatory evidence including fabricated testimony & forensic/fingerprint evidence NOT from Cole was actually discovered.
Plourd enlisted the California Innocence Project to assist in the effort to get Cole's conviction overturned. They filed a petition alleging ineffective counsel, prosecutors withheld key evidence and knowingly introduced false evidence at trial. In April 2009 a judge vacated the murder conviction.
And there you have it! The answer to reducing the chances of wronfully executing an innocent man is have your checks and balances together throughout the investigation and trial process.
Typical American idiots - when they execute the wrong man instead of saying we need more professional detectives, ethical prosecutors that thoroughly research the evidence presented and judges that are more concerned with getting the truth-than a re-election, they say let's stop the death penalty. How about let's prosecute the criminal judges, grimy detectives, dirty D.A.'s and perjurious witnesses that muddy evidence and twist truths?
The nucleus of the problem must be attacked. It's not just the act of execution that's killing innocent people, it is moreso the grotesque practices of corrupt individuals in positions of authority. Get rid of them and you've solved most of the problem. Then we can get back to ridding society of the rightfully convicted vermin that truly deserve the death penalty like in the case of Steven Hayes, a Connecticut man who was condemned to death for the rape, robbery and murder of a woman and her two daughters. Hayes and an accomplice broke into the house of a family of four (husband, wife & two daughters), forced the woman to withdraw money, took her back home once the funds were withdrawn, sexually assaulted her and then strangled her. The home was set on fire and killed all but the husband, who managed to escape.
I say NO to ending the death penalty. As long as the human, savage beast roams the earth preying upon innocent people there should be a death penalty in place. As a matter of fact, every North American citizens' household should have at least two guns in it for protection. And everyone in that house should know how to use it and understand its purpose.
**side note** The code of criminal procedure regarding murder and evidence in many of these states should be revised. Many times men, innocent or not, are being convicted on murder charges without bodies, without evidence and without credible witnesses.
Convicting a man when there is or should be reasonable doubt is preposterous!
When you have detectives that are lazy, eager to close cases and over zealous in the pursuit of a conviction, you end up with an unprofessional investigation, sloppy collection of evidence, unthorough questioning of witnesses & suspects and just an overall disorganized body of police work.
What adds insult to injury are judges that are more focused on re-elections than bringing the truth to the surface or doing their best to ensure justice is served, no matter the cost of the pursuit. When that is ignored or not placed into practice you have a tarnished justice system that will inevitably convict an innocent man.
In cases where prosecutors were so hard up to win a case at any expense, innocent people spent many years in prison or had been wrongly put to death. This is all directly related to poor investigations, uneducated or prejudicial jurors, dirty prosecutors, judges that are more concerned with clearing their calendars than the facts of the case and/or the use of jailhouse snitches anxious to spew lies in exchange for freedom or reduced sentences.
Case in point: Reggie DeShawn Cole, incarcerated for 14 years, on a murder & attempted robbery conviction, that he never committed. He maintained his innocence throughout his trial & incarceration. It was only because of his attorney Christopher Plourd, that exculpatory evidence including fabricated testimony & forensic/fingerprint evidence NOT from Cole was actually discovered.
Plourd enlisted the California Innocence Project to assist in the effort to get Cole's conviction overturned. They filed a petition alleging ineffective counsel, prosecutors withheld key evidence and knowingly introduced false evidence at trial. In April 2009 a judge vacated the murder conviction.
And there you have it! The answer to reducing the chances of wronfully executing an innocent man is have your checks and balances together throughout the investigation and trial process.
Typical American idiots - when they execute the wrong man instead of saying we need more professional detectives, ethical prosecutors that thoroughly research the evidence presented and judges that are more concerned with getting the truth-than a re-election, they say let's stop the death penalty. How about let's prosecute the criminal judges, grimy detectives, dirty D.A.'s and perjurious witnesses that muddy evidence and twist truths?
The nucleus of the problem must be attacked. It's not just the act of execution that's killing innocent people, it is moreso the grotesque practices of corrupt individuals in positions of authority. Get rid of them and you've solved most of the problem. Then we can get back to ridding society of the rightfully convicted vermin that truly deserve the death penalty like in the case of Steven Hayes, a Connecticut man who was condemned to death for the rape, robbery and murder of a woman and her two daughters. Hayes and an accomplice broke into the house of a family of four (husband, wife & two daughters), forced the woman to withdraw money, took her back home once the funds were withdrawn, sexually assaulted her and then strangled her. The home was set on fire and killed all but the husband, who managed to escape.
I say NO to ending the death penalty. As long as the human, savage beast roams the earth preying upon innocent people there should be a death penalty in place. As a matter of fact, every North American citizens' household should have at least two guns in it for protection. And everyone in that house should know how to use it and understand its purpose.
**side note** The code of criminal procedure regarding murder and evidence in many of these states should be revised. Many times men, innocent or not, are being convicted on murder charges without bodies, without evidence and without credible witnesses.
Convicting a man when there is or should be reasonable doubt is preposterous!
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Survey of Black People Regarding Azusa 13 Arrests
So, on my way from the shooting range today I thought I'd conduct an unofficial survey of Blacks in the area and get their thoughts and feelings on the arrests of some of the gang members in the Azusa 13. I was curious to know how Black people, particularly Black men, felt about the arrests and how they would possibly protect themselves against that type of systematic intimidation and violence. I was a little surprised to learn that none of them knew anything about this story. I say a little surprised because truly there was barely any news coverage of this story. Had I not saw it online I may not have known of it either. But still I went on with the survey....
I briefed them on the story and then asked how would you protect yourself. I was a little shocked to learn that some of them would just take the risk of being unarmed and some of them didn't want to offer an opinion at all. Granted they didn't know me from any other stranger and maybe weren't comfortable sharing that they carry and conceal, but I was at least hoping to hear that they would NOT be opposed to arming themselves. I wanted to hear that they are willing to protect themselves from danger no matter what. But I didn't hear that.
As I said, this was unofficial. Sometimes, I'll get a thought in my head and run with it. So, every Black person I passed by- I wanted to talk to, which were about seven (7) men and one (1) woman. Not enough for a true survey but it gave me some insight into how some of my people think. I will be venturing out to get more opinions later this week.
Ever since posting my videos regarding the arrests of the Azusa 13 I've gotten a lot of angry responses from wetbacks. Seems to me a bit peculiar. I don't get the animosity. They weren't angry at the fact that their wetback compadres were killing, assaulting, intimidating and robbing Black people, they were angry that I was telling Black people to fight back!
See in this country, maybe even around the world, there is a mind set that if you tell a Black man to defend himself in the same manner in which he is being assaulted, then you are wrong. It's retard logic and I don't subscribe to that...
As long as Blacks are yelling PEACE and being slapped around, beaten and killed without resistance, all is well in the world. But when a Black person puts up his fists or raises a gun to protect himself from an attack, then some folks out there want to reduce it to savagery. All I'm saying is a Black person has just as much right to defend himself against a violent act as any other man and many times that means exerting his own violence.
America has taught me that when you truly want peace you must obtain it through force and use of weapons. That is why when she wants peace she invades countries with the support of armed forces and heavy artillery at her fingertips. And she doesn't stop her tyranny until her mission is accomplished-all in the name of peace...
Black people deserve peace as well. The two people mentioned in the article were non-gang members (one a preacher, the other a high school student), both killed by the hands of wetbacks trying to rid the city of Blacks. That's not being able to live in peace, that's existing under the tyranny of terrorists and my ancestors did not fight, die and endure assaults for us to have to go through that again.
Some may argue well what about the havoc that your own people wreak on each other? I say to hell with ALL trouble makers. But the article was not about them, it was about the Azusa 13 and the plan they had against a group of people that have just as much a right to live in that city as they do!
I briefed them on the story and then asked how would you protect yourself. I was a little shocked to learn that some of them would just take the risk of being unarmed and some of them didn't want to offer an opinion at all. Granted they didn't know me from any other stranger and maybe weren't comfortable sharing that they carry and conceal, but I was at least hoping to hear that they would NOT be opposed to arming themselves. I wanted to hear that they are willing to protect themselves from danger no matter what. But I didn't hear that.
As I said, this was unofficial. Sometimes, I'll get a thought in my head and run with it. So, every Black person I passed by- I wanted to talk to, which were about seven (7) men and one (1) woman. Not enough for a true survey but it gave me some insight into how some of my people think. I will be venturing out to get more opinions later this week.
Ever since posting my videos regarding the arrests of the Azusa 13 I've gotten a lot of angry responses from wetbacks. Seems to me a bit peculiar. I don't get the animosity. They weren't angry at the fact that their wetback compadres were killing, assaulting, intimidating and robbing Black people, they were angry that I was telling Black people to fight back!
See in this country, maybe even around the world, there is a mind set that if you tell a Black man to defend himself in the same manner in which he is being assaulted, then you are wrong. It's retard logic and I don't subscribe to that...
As long as Blacks are yelling PEACE and being slapped around, beaten and killed without resistance, all is well in the world. But when a Black person puts up his fists or raises a gun to protect himself from an attack, then some folks out there want to reduce it to savagery. All I'm saying is a Black person has just as much right to defend himself against a violent act as any other man and many times that means exerting his own violence.
America has taught me that when you truly want peace you must obtain it through force and use of weapons. That is why when she wants peace she invades countries with the support of armed forces and heavy artillery at her fingertips. And she doesn't stop her tyranny until her mission is accomplished-all in the name of peace...
Black people deserve peace as well. The two people mentioned in the article were non-gang members (one a preacher, the other a high school student), both killed by the hands of wetbacks trying to rid the city of Blacks. That's not being able to live in peace, that's existing under the tyranny of terrorists and my ancestors did not fight, die and endure assaults for us to have to go through that again.
Some may argue well what about the havoc that your own people wreak on each other? I say to hell with ALL trouble makers. But the article was not about them, it was about the Azusa 13 and the plan they had against a group of people that have just as much a right to live in that city as they do!
Saturday, June 11, 2011
Tracy Morgans' Anti-Gay Rants...What Happened To The 1st Amendment In This Country?!
The very fiber that built and kept this country strong for over 100 years is now being dissected and shredded to pieces as if it never had a place in our society. Constitutional amendments like freedom of speech and the right to bear arms, are now the very things being used against us.
We are living in a society today where people are overly sensitive and have been catered to far too often, so much so that it has adversely affected their common sense.
I didn't hear the anti-gay rant that Tracy Morgan recently unleashed in a stand up comedy act in Nashville, but I did catch the "N" word rant on YouTube that Michael Richards did three years ago. And I felt the same way I feel today, a man has the right to speak however frankly he chooses and you have a right to get up and walk out, but you don't have a right to infringe upon his 1st amendment rights. Listen, Michael Richards lost a lot of his Black fans that night, I was never a fan of his but I supported his right to conduct a comedy show that may involve words some people would not approve of.
Based on where we are today in this hypocrital society of not-calling-a-spade-a-spade, except in the privacy of our own homes, I think that pretty soon we'll get to a point where it's politically incorrect to call junk food-junk food. We'll be expected to call it something like: treasure treats or happy nibbles or some crap like that. I mean afterall, it does make most people happy when they're eating it...
A study conducted by the U.K and U.S.A. suggested that people who own animals should no longer "degrade" the animals they own by calling them pets. They should be called "companions" instead...
I nearly shit myself when I read this!
Why don't we just call them 'wonderful, evolving forms of life' or 'dream companions'-afterall, dogs are loyal, trustworthy and always have your best interest at heart. I mean that about the dogs, but I'm joking about the terms. This study (supposedly compiled by university professors from U.K. & U.S.A.) only goes to show how much brain matter some of us have lost as a global society. And wasting money on studies like this, when that money should be used toward fighting homelessnesss and hunger in the very countries conducting these pointless studies, only supports my theory.
I mean why don't we extend the politically, technically correct BS to cars and refer to them as 'most appreciated forms of transporation' or something with a little more appreciation for its purpose. And let's not stop at cars, most people believe in aliens from outerspace but I'm sure if they knew we were calling them aliens they'd be offended too, so let's refer to them as 'friends of the universe'....
I'm almost puking right now. Where does it stop is my point!
Being expected and forced to use politically/technically correct terms has killed this country and deadened our sense of humor to a great extent. It may not seem all that serious but it truly is. Do you know why shows and movies like All In The Family, Sanford & Son, The Jeffersons & Blazing Saddles are still hugely popular in modern age society? Because the content was not pc, it wasn't filtered and people spoke honestly and freely and they used terms that today would get a person fired.
I don't understand taking away a mans' right to survival (his money) simply because he called a Black person a nigger or a homosexual a faggot. Those that want to ostracize him may do so, no one is required to be around a person they don't like, but it is not right to take away his livelihood. Tracy Morgan may be fired over the anti-gay rant, I think that's unfair. Now, if the fans of Tracy Morgan stop coming to his shows I would say those are the consequences he had to suffer because obviously they didn't appreciate his words. But that would directly be of his own doing not the studios or networks taking matters into their own hands...
In today's North America we are expected to call mexicans latinos-it used to be chicano, I guess they've evolved to a higher standing in the last 20 years *blank stare*. Orientals are now asian-what the hell happened? They didn't stop having slanted eyes, course, dark hair and yellow skin. And the Negroe, it is a must that we are now called African American-used to be Black and before that is was colored. Did somebody all of a sudden remember our kinky hair and dark skin?
And of course we have the others, a mix of ethnicities from different countries, all vying for a pc title of their own. But what all these people are forgetting is no matter how someone refers to you or what a person chooses to call you, the only one that truly defines you-IS YOU.
Oh, I don't deny that words can be hurtful, especially when they are used for that exact purpose, but what's the difference if a person voices that they think of you as a nigger or just simply TREATS you like one without ever using the "n" word?
We are living in a society today where people are overly sensitive and have been catered to far too often, so much so that it has adversely affected their common sense.
I didn't hear the anti-gay rant that Tracy Morgan recently unleashed in a stand up comedy act in Nashville, but I did catch the "N" word rant on YouTube that Michael Richards did three years ago. And I felt the same way I feel today, a man has the right to speak however frankly he chooses and you have a right to get up and walk out, but you don't have a right to infringe upon his 1st amendment rights. Listen, Michael Richards lost a lot of his Black fans that night, I was never a fan of his but I supported his right to conduct a comedy show that may involve words some people would not approve of.
Based on where we are today in this hypocrital society of not-calling-a-spade-a-spade, except in the privacy of our own homes, I think that pretty soon we'll get to a point where it's politically incorrect to call junk food-junk food. We'll be expected to call it something like: treasure treats or happy nibbles or some crap like that. I mean afterall, it does make most people happy when they're eating it...
A study conducted by the U.K and U.S.A. suggested that people who own animals should no longer "degrade" the animals they own by calling them pets. They should be called "companions" instead...
I nearly shit myself when I read this!
Why don't we just call them 'wonderful, evolving forms of life' or 'dream companions'-afterall, dogs are loyal, trustworthy and always have your best interest at heart. I mean that about the dogs, but I'm joking about the terms. This study (supposedly compiled by university professors from U.K. & U.S.A.) only goes to show how much brain matter some of us have lost as a global society. And wasting money on studies like this, when that money should be used toward fighting homelessnesss and hunger in the very countries conducting these pointless studies, only supports my theory.
I mean why don't we extend the politically, technically correct BS to cars and refer to them as 'most appreciated forms of transporation' or something with a little more appreciation for its purpose. And let's not stop at cars, most people believe in aliens from outerspace but I'm sure if they knew we were calling them aliens they'd be offended too, so let's refer to them as 'friends of the universe'....
I'm almost puking right now. Where does it stop is my point!
Being expected and forced to use politically/technically correct terms has killed this country and deadened our sense of humor to a great extent. It may not seem all that serious but it truly is. Do you know why shows and movies like All In The Family, Sanford & Son, The Jeffersons & Blazing Saddles are still hugely popular in modern age society? Because the content was not pc, it wasn't filtered and people spoke honestly and freely and they used terms that today would get a person fired.
I don't understand taking away a mans' right to survival (his money) simply because he called a Black person a nigger or a homosexual a faggot. Those that want to ostracize him may do so, no one is required to be around a person they don't like, but it is not right to take away his livelihood. Tracy Morgan may be fired over the anti-gay rant, I think that's unfair. Now, if the fans of Tracy Morgan stop coming to his shows I would say those are the consequences he had to suffer because obviously they didn't appreciate his words. But that would directly be of his own doing not the studios or networks taking matters into their own hands...
In today's North America we are expected to call mexicans latinos-it used to be chicano, I guess they've evolved to a higher standing in the last 20 years *blank stare*. Orientals are now asian-what the hell happened? They didn't stop having slanted eyes, course, dark hair and yellow skin. And the Negroe, it is a must that we are now called African American-used to be Black and before that is was colored. Did somebody all of a sudden remember our kinky hair and dark skin?
And of course we have the others, a mix of ethnicities from different countries, all vying for a pc title of their own. But what all these people are forgetting is no matter how someone refers to you or what a person chooses to call you, the only one that truly defines you-IS YOU.
Oh, I don't deny that words can be hurtful, especially when they are used for that exact purpose, but what's the difference if a person voices that they think of you as a nigger or just simply TREATS you like one without ever using the "n" word?
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Azusa 13 Wetbacks Indicted on RICO charges....DEPORT THEIR ASSES!
So this morning I read an article posted on Presstelegram.com. It told the story of how 51 members of the Azusa 13 gang were arrested yesterday on charges ranging from harrassment and racist graffiti towards Blacks to beatings and robberies. The race-based hate crimes were inflicted upon the Blacks in that area from 1992 until May 2010.
My questions to the U.S. Attorney are: Why did it take the Feds so long to arrest these low-life, savage, illegal mongrels? and Were you investigating the crimes over that long period of time? or Were you hoping for a race-fueled war? Were these terrorist animals being monitored daily, weekly or monthly? or maybe they were being allowed to harrass and violate the Blacks because the Feds didn't give a damn about how they were being treated.
But I wonder why the Blacks in that area weren't arming themselves. Why weren't they protecting themselves? Afterall, you have a right to defend yourself against any and ALL threats of violence, by any means necessary!... Even if that means sending those illegal border rats back home in body bags.
Never be afraid to bleed and more importantly NEVER be afraid to make a muthafucka bleed-out!
You can either be a survivor or a victim. You have a choice.
Every Black person should be armed in this country but especially in any area where you are being targeted for hate crimes. You should have a strap on you at all times, know how to use it and be ready to use it. Because now you know you have a target on your head. You're being hunted by savage, illegal criminals who have no legal rights to be here in this country and thereby can come and go without much notice... Be ready to body bag them and make no apologies!
It angers me that in the country that OUR ancestors built through blood, sweat, tears, some lost their lives and others endured years of abuse, that we are again facing those same atrocities. Arm yourselves and protect yourselves. The government is not going to do it. Even under the RICO law those animals could serve as little as 10 years in a federal prison.
Why should the North American tax payer shell out money for a group of aliens most of us don't want here anyway?
And to any Black person who will try to speak up for them or remind me of any rights in this country they may have, I say to hell with you. JOIN THEM IN MEXICO and die there you traitorous scum. How dare you defend the very same individuals that would just as soon see you dead and hanging from the end of a rope than living peacefully and free in this country that YOUR ancestors built and contributed to making what was once considered the Leader of the Free World.
They could never have accomplished in mexico what has been accomplished here in North America and the proof is in the conditions of mexico historically to present day. They are a vile and corrupt group of individuals with no respect for law, humanity or peace. They thrive on violence and anarchy and I say exterminate them in the manner in which they are used to being dealt with.
I cannot wait until we finally rid ourselves of the mexican scum that has illegally invaded this country over the last 150 years. I say it must be done quickly because the integrity of this country, that our ancestors fought so hard to have, has now been tainted and nearly destroyed by their presence.
I cannot say enough about how much I hate them and how when I look around me at cities that are now infested with them I just want to puke. They have destroyed their own country through criminal activities including but not limited to drug smuggling, bribes, questionable politicians, etc. and now they have come here to destroy ours. I wouldn't at all be surprised if the "powers that be" conspired to send them here with that very objective in mind!
Afterall, most mexicans are bitter about this country being "taken" from them, even though it wasn't taken - they lost it in the mexican american war of 1846. But the sore losers found a way to guilt white americans into allowing them to enter this country and stay here, pretty much without fear of deportation, by threatening to make them look like racists. Yea, we're partially responsible that the white man now fears being called that word. But when we legitimately fought against racism that fight turned into law and the dirty mexican found a way to use our laws to their favor. Our struggles to their favor and the political correctness as well.
So, instead of white people (who had all the powers in this country) forcing them out years ago, they let them stay out of fear of being called racist-not to mention the cheap labor didn't hurt. But look at where we are now....
I have never been a part of any gang, group or movement. Hell, by the time I was born the two biggest music stars in the world were Black and so was the mayor of Los Angeles. But I think it's time that there was a new movement formed. One in which we Negroes protect and ride for each other.
Some people say the negroe lacks loyalty, self control, work ethic, etc. I say bullshit. Our ancestors possessed all those qualities and it was because of those qualities they achieved the rights in which we and others (like those wetbacks) benefit from to this day. Some of us just need a reason to exercise them...
I can't think of a better reason than this. But be prepared for war and be prepared to handle both traitors and enemies with swift death.
When the nation that owes you everything will not protect you, you must find a way to protect yourself.
My questions to the U.S. Attorney are: Why did it take the Feds so long to arrest these low-life, savage, illegal mongrels? and Were you investigating the crimes over that long period of time? or Were you hoping for a race-fueled war? Were these terrorist animals being monitored daily, weekly or monthly? or maybe they were being allowed to harrass and violate the Blacks because the Feds didn't give a damn about how they were being treated.
But I wonder why the Blacks in that area weren't arming themselves. Why weren't they protecting themselves? Afterall, you have a right to defend yourself against any and ALL threats of violence, by any means necessary!... Even if that means sending those illegal border rats back home in body bags.
Never be afraid to bleed and more importantly NEVER be afraid to make a muthafucka bleed-out!
You can either be a survivor or a victim. You have a choice.
Every Black person should be armed in this country but especially in any area where you are being targeted for hate crimes. You should have a strap on you at all times, know how to use it and be ready to use it. Because now you know you have a target on your head. You're being hunted by savage, illegal criminals who have no legal rights to be here in this country and thereby can come and go without much notice... Be ready to body bag them and make no apologies!
It angers me that in the country that OUR ancestors built through blood, sweat, tears, some lost their lives and others endured years of abuse, that we are again facing those same atrocities. Arm yourselves and protect yourselves. The government is not going to do it. Even under the RICO law those animals could serve as little as 10 years in a federal prison.
Why should the North American tax payer shell out money for a group of aliens most of us don't want here anyway?
And to any Black person who will try to speak up for them or remind me of any rights in this country they may have, I say to hell with you. JOIN THEM IN MEXICO and die there you traitorous scum. How dare you defend the very same individuals that would just as soon see you dead and hanging from the end of a rope than living peacefully and free in this country that YOUR ancestors built and contributed to making what was once considered the Leader of the Free World.
They could never have accomplished in mexico what has been accomplished here in North America and the proof is in the conditions of mexico historically to present day. They are a vile and corrupt group of individuals with no respect for law, humanity or peace. They thrive on violence and anarchy and I say exterminate them in the manner in which they are used to being dealt with.
I cannot wait until we finally rid ourselves of the mexican scum that has illegally invaded this country over the last 150 years. I say it must be done quickly because the integrity of this country, that our ancestors fought so hard to have, has now been tainted and nearly destroyed by their presence.
I cannot say enough about how much I hate them and how when I look around me at cities that are now infested with them I just want to puke. They have destroyed their own country through criminal activities including but not limited to drug smuggling, bribes, questionable politicians, etc. and now they have come here to destroy ours. I wouldn't at all be surprised if the "powers that be" conspired to send them here with that very objective in mind!
Afterall, most mexicans are bitter about this country being "taken" from them, even though it wasn't taken - they lost it in the mexican american war of 1846. But the sore losers found a way to guilt white americans into allowing them to enter this country and stay here, pretty much without fear of deportation, by threatening to make them look like racists. Yea, we're partially responsible that the white man now fears being called that word. But when we legitimately fought against racism that fight turned into law and the dirty mexican found a way to use our laws to their favor. Our struggles to their favor and the political correctness as well.
So, instead of white people (who had all the powers in this country) forcing them out years ago, they let them stay out of fear of being called racist-not to mention the cheap labor didn't hurt. But look at where we are now....
I have never been a part of any gang, group or movement. Hell, by the time I was born the two biggest music stars in the world were Black and so was the mayor of Los Angeles. But I think it's time that there was a new movement formed. One in which we Negroes protect and ride for each other.
Some people say the negroe lacks loyalty, self control, work ethic, etc. I say bullshit. Our ancestors possessed all those qualities and it was because of those qualities they achieved the rights in which we and others (like those wetbacks) benefit from to this day. Some of us just need a reason to exercise them...
I can't think of a better reason than this. But be prepared for war and be prepared to handle both traitors and enemies with swift death.
When the nation that owes you everything will not protect you, you must find a way to protect yourself.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Rihanna Controversy Over "Man Down" Video...
I love that the Rihanna video "Man Down" is creating so much buzz because it is bringing an overdue awareness to the real life issue of rape....
Imagine how a woman must truly feel after being assaulted in such a way. Feeling undeniably dirty, alone and afraid. Wanting to do nothing but exact revenge however she deems fit. Sometimes fantasizing about raping the rapist maybe with a broomstick or a flashlight and other times entertaining deeper, darker fantasies like killing him, walking up to him, pulling out a gun and blasting his worthless, savage head off. Don't tell me there aren't women out there that think and feel this way. I refuse to believe it!...
I refuse to believe that there is a woman in the world who wouldn't want to take the life of the beast that violated her in the most primitive way a man can violate a woman and that is through raping her.
The outcry of some people in the public to Rihannas' "Man Down" video sickens me and it just makes me wonder if any of the women who are all up-in-arms over the murder of the rapist or the violence in the video would be as offended had it been their true life story, if they were being subjected to an unwanted, invasive dick!?
Rape is THE most violent act a person can impose on another and I say it is the most violent because it has the longest lasting effects; mentally, emotionally, spiritually, socially and psychologically, not only on the victim but on the family, friends, children & intimate partners as well. Lives have been forever changed, innocence forever stolen from numerous women, children and men due to this very act. Many women and children in countries across Africa- in particular, are living nightmarish existences because everyday they face the possibility that some primitive human animal will kidnap them and rape them for no other reason otherthan he felt like it.
Lesbian women are facing their own challenges in South Africa with men who believe they can rape them into heterosexuality. In April 2009 former star of South Africa's national female football squad, Eudy Simelane, was gang-raped, brutally beaten and stabbed twenty-five (25) times in the face, chest and legs. She was only 31 years old. One of the three (3) savage rapists was sentenced to life in prison (as he was the one that actually did the killing), the other two were acquitted-not even prosecuted for the assault or the rape!
An article from website guardian.co.uk reports, one in four South African men have admitted to rape and confess to attacking more than one victim. Three of four first began raping women while in their teens. Three percent (3%) of them admitted to raping a man or boy.
Adding insult to injury is the fact that any woman raped by a man over the age of 25 has a one in four chance of her attacker being HIV positive.
Here in North America we have our issues with this epidemic as well, not only in "free" society but in prisons across the nation. Imagine being a young, wrongly accused and incarcerated boy put into a cellblock with violent inmates, most of which are Black. They size you up and decide that you will be their next victim. You are raped repeatedly in the ass, beaten, passed around and used over and over again until your anus no longer functions as it should and is so loose that for the rest of your life you have no choice but to wear diapers. Not only that, but because you contracted herpes from your rapist(s) and a different rapist caught it, he gets mad at you for not telling him about your disease and partially chops off your tongue. This is a true story. Happened to a kid in New York serving a short stint for a crime he didn't commit...
I say all rapists should be killed. They don't deserve life. They are useless and have no redeeming qualities. They are usually repeat offenders and that is a clear sign that it can not be rehabilitated. *If a wild animal is caught in the act of attacking a human being it is swiftly killed. Hell, they'll even hunt the poor animal down and kill it to thwart any possible future attacks.* There is a big difference though between that beast and the rapist beast. I have a huge problem with an animal being hunted down and killed, it is a wild animal and that is what they do! If it is killed in the midst of an attack, that is the only thing that I support. But the human animal is a different beast altogether....
Because a wild animal does what is inate to his existence and usually only attacks to protect; itself, its cubs, food or territory. What excuse does the human rapist beast have?
So, to the Parents Television Council and all parents talking about boycotting Rihannas' video and album I say grab a piece of masking tape, put it across your lips and SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Some of your children have seen more in your dysfunctional, toxic households than they will ever witness in a Rihanna video. And by the way if you were not purchasing the music they would have a harder time accessing it, not that it was made for them to listen to in the first place, but I just thought I'd point that out.
If you were strong role models for your children you wouldn't be looking for musicians (notorious for being eccentric), actors (notorious for being neurotic) or anyone else for your children to look up to. YOU would be in that role. Remember that the next time you accuse Rihanna of not being a positive role model to the children of the world. Parents, pastors and politicians used to hold that title, what happened?
Imagine how a woman must truly feel after being assaulted in such a way. Feeling undeniably dirty, alone and afraid. Wanting to do nothing but exact revenge however she deems fit. Sometimes fantasizing about raping the rapist maybe with a broomstick or a flashlight and other times entertaining deeper, darker fantasies like killing him, walking up to him, pulling out a gun and blasting his worthless, savage head off. Don't tell me there aren't women out there that think and feel this way. I refuse to believe it!...
I refuse to believe that there is a woman in the world who wouldn't want to take the life of the beast that violated her in the most primitive way a man can violate a woman and that is through raping her.
The outcry of some people in the public to Rihannas' "Man Down" video sickens me and it just makes me wonder if any of the women who are all up-in-arms over the murder of the rapist or the violence in the video would be as offended had it been their true life story, if they were being subjected to an unwanted, invasive dick!?
Rape is THE most violent act a person can impose on another and I say it is the most violent because it has the longest lasting effects; mentally, emotionally, spiritually, socially and psychologically, not only on the victim but on the family, friends, children & intimate partners as well. Lives have been forever changed, innocence forever stolen from numerous women, children and men due to this very act. Many women and children in countries across Africa- in particular, are living nightmarish existences because everyday they face the possibility that some primitive human animal will kidnap them and rape them for no other reason otherthan he felt like it.
Lesbian women are facing their own challenges in South Africa with men who believe they can rape them into heterosexuality. In April 2009 former star of South Africa's national female football squad, Eudy Simelane, was gang-raped, brutally beaten and stabbed twenty-five (25) times in the face, chest and legs. She was only 31 years old. One of the three (3) savage rapists was sentenced to life in prison (as he was the one that actually did the killing), the other two were acquitted-not even prosecuted for the assault or the rape!
An article from website guardian.co.uk reports, one in four South African men have admitted to rape and confess to attacking more than one victim. Three of four first began raping women while in their teens. Three percent (3%) of them admitted to raping a man or boy.
Adding insult to injury is the fact that any woman raped by a man over the age of 25 has a one in four chance of her attacker being HIV positive.
Here in North America we have our issues with this epidemic as well, not only in "free" society but in prisons across the nation. Imagine being a young, wrongly accused and incarcerated boy put into a cellblock with violent inmates, most of which are Black. They size you up and decide that you will be their next victim. You are raped repeatedly in the ass, beaten, passed around and used over and over again until your anus no longer functions as it should and is so loose that for the rest of your life you have no choice but to wear diapers. Not only that, but because you contracted herpes from your rapist(s) and a different rapist caught it, he gets mad at you for not telling him about your disease and partially chops off your tongue. This is a true story. Happened to a kid in New York serving a short stint for a crime he didn't commit...
I say all rapists should be killed. They don't deserve life. They are useless and have no redeeming qualities. They are usually repeat offenders and that is a clear sign that it can not be rehabilitated. *If a wild animal is caught in the act of attacking a human being it is swiftly killed. Hell, they'll even hunt the poor animal down and kill it to thwart any possible future attacks.* There is a big difference though between that beast and the rapist beast. I have a huge problem with an animal being hunted down and killed, it is a wild animal and that is what they do! If it is killed in the midst of an attack, that is the only thing that I support. But the human animal is a different beast altogether....
Because a wild animal does what is inate to his existence and usually only attacks to protect; itself, its cubs, food or territory. What excuse does the human rapist beast have?
So, to the Parents Television Council and all parents talking about boycotting Rihannas' video and album I say grab a piece of masking tape, put it across your lips and SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Some of your children have seen more in your dysfunctional, toxic households than they will ever witness in a Rihanna video. And by the way if you were not purchasing the music they would have a harder time accessing it, not that it was made for them to listen to in the first place, but I just thought I'd point that out.
If you were strong role models for your children you wouldn't be looking for musicians (notorious for being eccentric), actors (notorious for being neurotic) or anyone else for your children to look up to. YOU would be in that role. Remember that the next time you accuse Rihanna of not being a positive role model to the children of the world. Parents, pastors and politicians used to hold that title, what happened?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)